Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Environmental
Early Data Collection
  • US 24 West EA
  • Technical Leadership Team
  • February 9, 2005
2
Policy
  • NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act
  • FHWA role invokes federal environmental law
  • EA to determine if significant impacts occur


3
Policy: EA Process
  • Identify purpose and need
  • Develop alternatives
  • Evaluate impacts and mitigations
  • Documentation
  • Public involvement woven throughout


4
Overview
  • 20+ environmental resources addressed in EA
    • Natural environment
    • Built and social environment
5
Overview
  • Focus: possible alternative-shaping resources
  • Preliminary data collected for select environmental resources


6
Overview
    • Traffic and Accidents
    • Floodplains
    • Hazardous Waste
    • Historic Properties
    • Parks and Open Space
    • Wildlife and Threatened/Endangered Species
    • Environmental Justice

7
Traffic and Accidents
  • Traffic volumes and accidents may shape the purpose and need
8
Traffic and Accidents
  • Traffic Volumes
    • City of Colorado Springs counts
    • CDOT counts and AADTs
    • Turning movements from City of Colorado Springs
    • Gold Hill Mesa Traffic Study
  • PPACG Model Volumes
    • 2000 daily model volumes
    • 2030 daily, AM, and PM model volumes
9
Traffic and Accidents
  • Some gaps in existing traffic data
  • US 24 accident data for Jan ‘00-Dec ‘02
    • Segments rated good, fair, or poor based on statewide accident rates


10
Traffic and Accidents
11
Floodplains
  • Floodplains may affect alternative structures, alignments or stormwater facilities
12
Floodplains

  • Most of US 24 within 100-year floodplain
  • Flooding has occurred in project area
    • 1999 and 2000 flooding in Manitou Springs and at 21st Street/US 24

13
Floodplains
14
Floodplains
  • Current studies may redefine floodplain limits
    • 100-year limits likely to widen
    • Conveyance capacity reduced over time
  • Floodplain encroachment  serious local/regional concern


15
Hazardous Waste
  • Hazardous waste sites may affect alignments because of ROW limits or remediation constraints
16
Hazardous Waste
  • 118 sites of potential concern within 1,000 feet of US 24
  • Types of sites vary in corridor
    • On Record/Contaminated/Remediated
    • Active/Closed
    • Sites of greatest concern are those which are Contaminated and Active

17
Hazardous Waste
18
Hazardous Waste
  • 7 sites implementing corrective action plans
    • 6 gas stations
    • Chief Petroleum Bulk Plant
  • All sites less than ¼-mile from US 24 and near Fountain Creek


19
Hazardous Waste
  • Gold Hill Mesa
    • Former gold extraction facility
    • Redeveloping for residential use
20
Historic Properties
  • Historic properties may affect location of improvements or ROW acquisition
21
Historic Properties
  • Includes buildings, structures, archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties
  • Historic properties are eligible or listed on the NRHP because they
    • Are associated with important historical events
    • Are associated with lives of persons important to history
    • Represent significant architecture/engineering style
    • Have or may yield important historical information

22
Historic Properties
  • Properties within 1,000 feet of US 24
    • 2 listed on the NRHP
    • 8 field-assessed as eligible for the NRHP
    • 2 field-assessed as contributing to a Historic District
  • Listed, eligible and contributing properties all protected
23
Historic Properties
  • Two NRHP-listed Historic Districts intersect project limits
    • Manitou Springs Historic District generally encompasses all of Manitou Springs
    • Old Colorado City Historic Commercial District along Colorado Ave from 24th to 26th Street
24
Historic Properties
25
Historic Properties
  • Adverse effects include ROW acquisition and altering historic environment
  • Adverse effects influence alternatives design
  • Adverse effects require MOA with SHPO and Section 4(f) Evaluation
26
Parks and Open Space
  • Parks and open space generate traffic and require access, and may affect location of improvements or ROW acquisition
27
Parks and Open Space
28
Wildlife
    • Wildlife may affect how structures or barriers are designed to prevent entry onto roadways
    • Action can not “harm” federal or state T&E species
29
Wildlife
  • FWS lists 13 T&E species in El Paso County
  • Preble’s jumping mouse, Arkansas darter, and bald eagles may be present in project area


30
Wildlife
  • Large open space, park, and forest areas south of US 24 in El Paso County
  • No CNHP habitat in study area
  • Degraded condition of Fountain Creek limits habitat and wildlife values in project area
31
Wildlife
32
Environmental Justice
  • Low-income and minority populations must not be disproportionately adversely affected
33
Environmental Justice
  • No minority or low-income populations identified at Census Block Group level
  • Isolated neighborhoods may exist
34
Summary